<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Social Media Marketing Strategies - Latest Comments in Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:40:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-6206314</link><description>Wow, good tips there! It may not be new tips but they are definitely practical tips that we sometimes forget like for example the feedback item, we disregard it importance a couple of times yet this is the best way to assess the effects of your site to your readers. By the way, I happen to visit a cool site which mentioned b2c as another subtype of &amp;lt;a href=” &lt;a href="http://www" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www&lt;/a&gt;. squidoo.com/are_ you_1_of_us”&amp;gt;ONLINE MARKETING&lt;/a&gt;...I encourage you to know more about it! It is another good strategy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tammygirl25</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-6205927</link><description>Wow, good tips there! It may not be new tips but they are definitely practical tips that we sometimes forget like for example the feedback item, we disregard it importance a couple of times yet this is the best way to assess the effects of your site to your readers. By the way, I happen to visit a cool site which mentioned b2c as another subtype of &amp;lt;a href=” &lt;a href="http://www" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www&lt;/a&gt;. squidoo.com/are_ you_1_of_us”&amp;gt;ONLINE MARKETING&lt;/a&gt;...I encourage you to know more about it! It is another good strategy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tammygirl25</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:21:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-5552371</link><description>Very good post..thx</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Online Marketing</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:09:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-5235224</link><description>Online marketing is not a easy task  we should work very hard to get the result. Anyway very good thoughts thanks for sharing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gochi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:55:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4966743</link><description>I think that we really do need to have separate Social Networking accounts for each major business or blog or product or service or interest we are heavily involved in. Many people who want to hear my Tweets about growing their business would not be so happy if I shared my other serious interests like healthy living or gardening or horses or music let alone philosophy. That is why I'm seeking a utility that allows someone to easily switch between personas on their PCs so they can be effective across multiple IDs on any number of services. Listeners / readers would be happier to have us separate our Tweets and comments by content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">InternetStrategist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:37:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4967349</link><description>I think there should be separate Twitter accounts which is why I'm seeking a utility that allows someone to easily switch between personas on their PCs so they can be effective across multiple IDs on any number of services. Listeners / readers would be happier to have Tweets and comments separated by content.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Internet Strategist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4495250</link><description>That makes sense.  I think for now, with my own project, I'll continue mostly to use my own twitter account but i've set up one for the product and will experiment a bit with both after we launch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeQW</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:51:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4490385</link><description>woops.... I was replying to a different thread.  my bad.  I'm excited about facebook connect. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.disqus.net/2008/12/16/disqus-and-facebook-connect" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.disqus.net/2008/12/16/disqus-and-fa...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">simonstudio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4490275</link><description>this is exciting, but I had a hard time getting a facebook application going.  isn't the whole idea of bringing your facebook community off facebook is that you might be bringing a less advanced crowd into your online life?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">simonstudio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4487943</link><description>Mike,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would create a separate entity for each. It all depends on the situation though. Loic is well known, so it's more beneficial for him to promote seesmic on his Twitter account rather then a separate one. I would let an employee run the official one, field questions, comments, make announcements etc. A little star power never hurts, that's for sure. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mfruchter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:38:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4463980</link><description>Great post Mike but I have a question...If there is someone who is the face of a product, should they create a separate twitter, facebook account for the product?  For example, should Loic focus on his own twitter account to promote seesmic or should he focus on the official seesmic account?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeQW</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:12:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts to Consider for Better Online Marketing</title><link>http://michaelfruchter.com/blog/2008/12/15/thoughts-to-consider-for-better-online-marketing/#comment-4949364</link><description>great post - and it ISN'T on paid blogging...shared!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Singer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>